JD Next Practice Exam 2025 – 400 Free Practice Questions to Pass the Exam

Question: 1 / 400

What does the term 'duty of care' imply in negligence cases?

A requirement for the plaintiff to prove damages

An obligation to act with reasonable care towards others

The term 'duty of care' in negligence cases refers to an obligation to act with reasonable care towards others to prevent foreseeable harm. This principle is fundamental in tort law, particularly in establishing whether a party is liable for negligence. When evaluating a negligence claim, the court first determines if the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff. If a duty is established, the focus then shifts to whether that duty was breached and if that breach caused harm to the plaintiff.

This concept is crucial because it sets the standard of conduct expected from individuals in various circumstances. The law recognizes that individuals must take reasonable precautions to avoid harming others, which can include situations such as driving, medical practice, premises liability, and more. Therefore, the essence of 'duty of care' helps establish a framework for judging actions and assigning responsibility, ensuring safety and accountability in interactions.

The other options do not accurately encapsulate the essence of 'duty of care.' While proving damages is necessary for establishing negligence, it is not the definition of duty of care itself. Referring to the term as exclusively relevant to contracts mischaracterizes its application, as duty of care primarily pertains to tort law. Lastly, describing it as an arbitrary guideline fails to recognize its foundational legal significance

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

A legal term exclusively relevant to contracts

An arbitrary guideline with no legal standing

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy